I found this very interesting counter argument sir.
http://www.baguiocityonline.com/daforum/viewtopic.php?pid=148570#p148570And an interesting article here
The city has about 350,000 heads now. if 40% will be relocated, it will be a burden off the city... 40% of 350,000 is 140,000. Let us also close Baguio to further immigration. The BLIST idea might attract mroe squatter as Filipinos are taught to be TOO tolerating about the "poor" even though it is in disregard of mother nature and safety.
http://www.pcij.org/stories/2000/baguio.htmlSir, I personally agree with the counter argument. Why not just relocated the 40% migrants in Baguio to the lowlands? Create a Metropolitan area there. It's a lot safer and easier. And cheaper probably.
I hope you'll consider the the suggestion by the said poster rather than creating BLIST.Please sir, I beg you to rethink about BLIST. Let's just coordinate with the lowland areas and bring half (or more) of the population down there. Let us remove the squatters(mostly who have) concrete houses) and relocated them in Tarlac, Pangasinan, La Union, Nueva Ecija. Tehre are lots of Lands here, besides many squatters come from these plaes (except for those who came from other Cordilleran areas).
This is the best way to save Baguio.
Let us not commercialize other Benguet areas but rather develop their AGRICULTURAL AND ECOTOURISM potentials